Government intends to lift the ban
In April 2023, following intense pressure from animal welfare organisations, the Labour government banned live animal exports. The basis of the ban was centered on an independent review that New Zealand’s international reputation was being damaged by its live animal export programme because of animal welfare standards being breached.
The government’s plan
With the ongoing pressure from SAFE (Save Animals From Exploitation) and other animal welfare organisations, the government is proceeding with caution. It intends to introduce amendments to the Animal Welfare Act 1999 that will impose strict regulations and ensure a ‘gold standard’ of care. This includes fit-for-purpose live export ships and certification regimes for the livestock and their destination country. The government believes these regulations will protect animal welfare and safety.
The government has not indicated the timing for these proposed legislative changes.
The good . . .
The answer is obvious – revenue. In 2022, before the ban on live animal exports, revenue of $524 million was generated for the farming sector. Reports say the ban resulted in a loss of between $50,000– $116,000/year per farm1 that, in the current economic climate, is significant to those who have lost this source of revenue. The return of live animal exports may bring some financial relief to farmers. With the level of red tape involved, the actual benefit of live animal exports is unclear.
The bad . . .
No animal, except of course those of the aquatic variety, is designed to sustain long journeys by sea. Exporting live animals to China, for example, can take anywhere between 15–40 days and, during that time, the animals have endured rough seas, long periods of standing in their own excrement, heat stress and injuries. The conditions during the journey are aggravated further because once the ship docks, there are no assurances of continuing animal welfare and safety on land. Many importing countries lack the minimum welfare standards that New Zealand enforces.
And the ugly
While petitions have been submitted and lobbyists are in full force in New Zealand, elsewhere in the world live animal exporting continues to be practised. Earlier this year, 2,000 cattle and 14,000 sheep spent two weeks enroute from Perth to the Middle East, only to be turned around and returned to port at Fremantle where they remained on the ship for almost six weeks while the exporter attempted to obtain a new export permit. The Australian government is now under immense pressure to follow through with its own election promise to ban live animal exports.
Will our government follow through on lifting the ban?
That remains unknown. Each side of the argument will continue to pressure the government to make what that side believes is the right decision.
There remains a strong belief that live animal export represents such a small share of agricultural revenue (0.2%)2 since 2015 that the damage to New Zealand’s ‘clean’ reputation is far worse than the benefit of the export receipts.
What farmers can certainly expect is that if the live animal export ban is overturned, there will be stricter regulation and more red tape, and the costs associated with those increased regulations may be onerous. Farmers can expect an update to this process this year.
1Livestock Export New Zealand.
2Ibid.